1. Fancy yourself a sleuth, evil mastermind, debating pro, and/or just plain love One Punch Man? If so, sign up for Akihabara Lounge's first Mafia game, themed on One Punch Man.

    LINK
  2. Hey you

    Yeah you!


    Have you always wanted to impress Gordon Ramsey with your culinary skills?

    Well you can't...

    But you can impress the NF community by joining the Cooking Contest in the Bento Box!

    And we promise we won't make you cry like him.
  3. Throwback Naruto : Hidden Village of Art has launched a new contest related to Naruto where Love and Spring is in the air, until next June 21.
    To know more click on the link: Spring Canon Pairings Drawing contest !!

Lolicon

Discussion in 'Debate Corner' started by ~Flippy, Apr 19, 2009.

  1. ~Flippy OM NOM NOM NOM

    Messages:
    6,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    I dont think this has been made into a debate thread in this section...

    Anyways.

    Here, debate lolicon- its legal status, morality, depictions from culture to culture, etc.

    Lolicon is the label for the preference, or interest, in very young girls, or girls that have [physical] childish characteristics.

    It does *not* only refer to the pornography genre, though it is possibly most commonly used to reference it in this day and age.

    Debate whatever you want about it- however, these are some questions that you may be interested in answering and discussing in the process:

    -Should animations, computer games, manga, etc. featuring female children, or women who resemble children, in sexual situations be outlawed or atleast heavily regulated?
    -Do you believe that an individual who is interested in lolicon-based animations, videogames, artwork, etc. is necessarily a pedophile? How would you explain someone who takes a universal interest in women of all age ranges?
    -Some argue that the legalization of lolicon animated material may actually reduce occurances of real-life pedophillic actions by providing users with an outlet of questionable healthiness. Would you agree? Why or why not?
    -The term "moe", as a classification of various fetishisms in anime and manga is sometimes used as a synonymous definition to "lolicon". How do you feel about this?
    -While child pornography was outlawed in Japan around 1999, the attempts of Japanese interest groups to end lolicon animated materials thus far have been either ignored, unconsidered, or rejected. Do you feel that this is for good reason?

    Of course, don't feel *expected* to answer these. They serve as a mere topic starter ideas.

    My opinion?

    Well, I don't necessarily disagree with lolicon animation, but at the same time I am very against real-life pedophilia. I guess the way I see it, is that there is a difference between a drawing and an actual photo or picture. However, I do not feel that it is appropriate for someone who is possibly in danger of participating in, or conducting, real-life pedophillic behavior to consume and enjoy lolicon animated materials. I treat that matter in the same way that I would treat this question: should a suicidal individual be given a handgun?

    Also, I feel that the focus on lolicon is biased to one gender. When you wiki "shotacon", the male equivalent to "lolicon", you will find a much more limited, if not non-existent, controversy section. Also, the comparison of groups focusing on lolicon to the groups also focusing on shotacon is, well, unfair. The reality is that both sexes are targeted by pedophillic individuals, and both young boys and girls can and will sometimes be abused and violated.
     
  2. Mintaka Active Member

    Messages:
    21,684
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    37
    Reputation:
    IT'S AWWWRIGHT!!!!
     
  3. Seto Kaiba God Hand Crusher

    Messages:
    42,675
    Likes Received:
    672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reputation:
    It's not my cup of tea, but for those that do enjoy should have the right to do so without fear of being punished by the law.
     
  4. Fran I'm with <b><font color="#000080">Bruce</font></b>

    Messages:
    13,387
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    In before Zaxxon.

    I hate to give the usual trite answer, but I think it's absolutely fine if its manga/anime. Actual paedophilia is however, immoral and morbid. Also, moe-esque characters :wtf. I love 'em. Although, seeing them in actual sex even in hentai is ... :oh
     
  5. ~Flippy OM NOM NOM NOM

    Messages:
    6,562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    I knew you'd come here :ho
     
  6. Bryan Paulsen Fitness Q and A

    Messages:
    2,336
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Given that morality is based on a bunch of emphemeral rationalizations designed to allow, or disallow behaviors it should be determined by the cultural values of a given society.

    And since rationalizations are designed to mask guttural reactions in an attempt to convince other people of a viewpoint it's a waste of time to even think a rationalization could ever be objectively correct (only possessing subjective truth value so far as the individual is concerned).

    If a society is okay with it, let it be. If not, just as well. Both sides are equally "correct".

    Maybe I'm wrong, maybe there is some objective standard for morality in general, and therefore this has some kind of clear-cut standard I'm unaware of.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2009
  7. Cardboard Tube Knight Heads or Tails?

    Messages:
    56,039
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Reputation:
    Lolicon is still wrong, its pedophilia and regardless of whether its drawn, imagined or real little kids, you're a pedophile for liking it.
     
  8. Zabuzalives Active Member

    Messages:
    4,845
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    If your getting excited about pre-pubescent children then your a pedophile.

    Doesnt matter if its a drawn representation or the real thing.


    What does seperate it from real pictures is that no children were harmed in the creating of it.
    I would like to know if such material would increase the chance for pedophiles to act on their urges. If not...i would not criminalize it, but would want it restricted cause i dont need that disgusting sexual preferance in the public view/space.
     
  9. Cardboard Tube Knight Heads or Tails?

    Messages:
    56,039
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Reputation:
    I think that the whole "Its just cartoons" thing is a way to not look like "real" pedophiles.
     
  10. Pilaf The Doom that came to Sarnath

    Messages:
    18,151
    Likes Received:
    339
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Reputation:
    Lolicon is no more an actual depiction of a child having sex or in a sexual position than a decapitation or other form of murder in a video game is an actual depiction of murder.

    The two things can and should be compared. Either both are legal and permissible for adults to view, or neither, but don't be a fucking hypocrite and say one is worse than the other.
     
  11. Cardboard Tube Knight Heads or Tails?

    Messages:
    56,039
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Reputation:

    Threatening me with being a hypocrite?

    Here is the thing, viewing a murder isn't illegal. Viewing child porn is.
     
  12. Pilaf The Doom that came to Sarnath

    Messages:
    18,151
    Likes Received:
    339
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Reputation:
    Here's the thing...lolicon isn't child porn.
     
  13. vervex Art prevails!

    Messages:
    10,334
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    I totally agree with this statement.

    Whether someone who watches child porn is a pedophile changes from a dictionary to the other. Some definitions say that a pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to kids, others say that it is someone who actually abuses a kids for his own pleasure.

    There is, however, still a big step between actual child porn and lolicon. By watching child porn, you are witnessing an act of raping and not reporting it to the police, which goes straight against the law and encourages more abuse of that kind. By watching lolicon, you are simply enjoying a cartoon, a simulation of drawn kids having sex. I could be wrong, but I strongly believe that many lolicon fans aren't aroused by actual kids having sex. Just as some people like hentai and dislike actual porn.

    Pilaf's example of murder was a good one too. If you murder in a game, are you a murderer? If you like to watch movies where people get killed, does it mean you'll be on a rampage in a public high school with a gun the next day? Or if you fap to gore, are you a potential serial killer? Of course not. It takes more than watching simulations to make you disturbed enough to kill people, or even to rape kids.

    For the ones against lolicon, you should consider that. No one is harmed in lolicon, and, well, it's obviously, after all, a simple cartoon.
     
  14. Adonis Logical Positivist Nazi

    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:

    The context is completely different and the distinction arbitrary.

    Let's go back to my old reliable example.

    Let's say you caught a MALE friend masturbating to cartoon depictions of male-on-male sex: would you buy his explanation that it's not "really gay" because it's not "real" men, just depictions of men, having sex? No, you'd call him full of shit. What's different here?

    There is no argument over the definition of pedophile, Vervex. The definition is anyone sexually attracted to prepubescent children. They don't have to act on it to be labeled as such hence why being a pedophile isn't a crime in and of itself. Claiming to not be gratifying oneself via the rape of children, while a clarification worth making, doesn't expunge the label of being a pedophile. Just like having fantasies in your head would make you a pedophile, so does jacking it to cartoon 9 year olds.

    As for Pilaf's analogy, perhaps violent video games/movies are fulfilling peoples' fantasies of violence and mayhem. Establishing that hypocrisy does nothing to dismiss the claim that people who enjoy loli are pedophiles. No one's arguing it will cause them to actually act on it thus the "school shootings" bit is no longer analogous and the whole point's moot. By the way, if you "fap to gore," that's a fetish worth looking into a psych evaluation over.
     
  15. Wolfarus Mrgrgr

    Messages:
    10,450
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    If the majority of lolicon was "realistic" when it comes to the consequences of 6-11 year old girls having sex (the injuries, the screaming, ect) then yes id agree that lolicon is made to appeal to pedophiles. Maybe even seriously deranged pedophiles, if watching a pre-pubescent girls vagina being torn open gets them off.

    But in MOST of the lolicon ive seen, the girls are physically "ok", if not perfectly well with the act. They are not being torn open, as a real girl of that age would be. And most of them seem to be enjoying the sex, if not portrayed as being the one who wanted it in the first place. I realize that this would prob be written off as "well, they are giving the sicko's the justification for their obsession. The little girls like it, want it and can take it"

    Which is a perfectly valid point to have, ill admit. But the physical fact of the matter is that the majority of lolicon females dont respond physically or mentally to sex as a real girl of the same age would, so i dont consider them to be human(in mind or body), and therefore human morals and standards / laws shouldnt apply to them.

    And yeah.. besides the fact that they arnt REAL TO BEGIN WITH (as opposed to real child porn. which is just 1001 differant ways of nasty and reprehensible). :oh

    Do i like it? not particularily. But am i going to slam the label of "pedophile rapist monster!" on somebody who does? Of course not. Its their fetish, let them enjoy it.



    (and im 75% sure this topic has been done before here)
     
  16. Seto Kaiba God Hand Crusher

    Messages:
    42,675
    Likes Received:
    672
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reputation:
    You can't arrest someone purely on the basis of being a pedophile. It's a reason to keep a look out for them, but if there isn't anything showing they plan to or have exploited real children you cannot touch them.

    But it is just cartoons. Fictional content in which no real person(s) are being exploited. You can't assume because they take part in consumption of fictional content that they are going to go out and actually rape a kid.

    Lolicon isn't child porn.
     
  17. Adonis Logical Positivist Nazi

    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Pedophiles aren't required to be rapists or be turned on by violence.

    It's just the reality that any pedophile who acts on his attraction (note how one is a pedophile even before acting on it) will inevitably lead to rape since a child legally can't (and more importantly won't) consent.

    Lolicon is made to appeal to pedophiles because it's a depiction of children in sexual situations.

    Of course in a fantasy world designed to appeal to pedophiles the children are "ok" with it. The fact you won't go that extra step into "perfectly well" even within this fantasy context is very telling that you're rationalizing.

    I imagine you're one of the people who would read Lolita and buy Humbert's embellishment that the girl seduced him.

    Learn the actual definition of pedophilia before arguing it.

    As I said, it's a pedophilic fantasy world designed to appeal to pedophiles.

    If anyone was saying children being raped was a requisite for pedophilia, you'd have a point. We didn't, you don't.

    You're the one who's not separating "pedophile" from "rapist monster."



    I'm 175% sure since I've been in at least 3 of them.
     
  18. Zaxxon Yoshi, The Big Fat Jerk

    Messages:
    10,901
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    I propose that if you think that an attraction to drawn young girls automatically makes someone a pedophile, you probably also think that if someone likes guro, that automatically makes them want to mutilate for pleasure.

    I mean, logically that's what it sounds like you're saying to me. :zaru
     
  19. Adonis Logical Positivist Nazi

    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Obviously, it makes one ponder the correlation.

    Your analogy doesn't stand because one requires an action (mutilation) while pedophilia doesn't.
     
  20. E Active Member

    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    it's all for teh lulz
     
  21. Vanity away fighting dragons

    Messages:
    33,275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reputation:
    I'm not into it but I don't really have a problem with it. There aren't any actual kids being harmed in it or anything. I don't see why something that's basically 'fake' like that should ever really be wrong.

    Also, people can't really help what they are attracted to. I am attracted to adult males which is considered normal for an adult female like myself. I know I can't 'help' feeling attracted to them though so people who are attracted to these other things probably can't 'help' feeling attracted to it either. And at least with lolicon, they aren't doing anything illegal. They might as well be able to see something like that.
     
  22. Wolfarus Mrgrgr

    Messages:
    10,450
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Thats your explanation for everything, isnt it? :zaru

    Bush's election wins? For the lulz

    The forming of the UN? For the lulz.

    Ect, ect so on and so forth. :pimp
     
  23. Vegitto-kun HOMUHOMUHOMU

    Messages:
    20,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    lolicon is awwwrrriight baby
     
  24. Jello Biafra The Golden Path Advisor

    Messages:
    8,476
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Reputation:
    No, if you're sexually attracted to young girls, you're a pedophile. End of discussion. It comes from the Greek words "pais", meaning child, and "philia", meaning love or friendship.

    That's what it means. A pedophile is sexually attracted to young children, often to the exclusion of adults. Whether you act on those urges is another story. If you do, you're a pedarest.

    So, in review, pedophilia = liking children sexually. Pederasty = having a sexual relationship with children.
     
  25. Zaxxon Yoshi, The Big Fat Jerk

    Messages:
    10,901
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    I'm sure that someone can get a visualization of mutilation in their head and possibly get off on it, hence they don't necessarily need to act. :zaru
     
  26. Adonis Logical Positivist Nazi

    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Likewise, getting off on a visualization of a child engaging in sex, whether assisted through cartoon depictions or purely mental, makes you a pedophile. :zaru

    You and others are attempting to skate along a gray area that just isn't there.
     
  27. Zaxxon Yoshi, The Big Fat Jerk

    Messages:
    10,901
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Maybe in thought, but not in practice, and maybe not a threat to anyone . . .
     
  28. Adonis Logical Positivist Nazi

    Messages:
    6,837
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    There is no "being a pedophile in practice." If you are sexually attracted to children, you're a pedophile. Bottom line. You're confusing it with pedarests as Jello pointed out.

    Again, no one (except maybe CTK) is calling you a threat to children. Not all, or even probably most, pedophiles go on to rape children.
     
  29. Zaxxon Yoshi, The Big Fat Jerk

    Messages:
    10,901
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    I'm just gonna agree with guy and leave it at that, before I go and put my foot in my mouth again. :nod
     
  30. vervex Art prevails!

    Messages:
    10,334
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    If watching lolicon does not make people rape children or encourage actual children pornography, then what is the problem with it? It does not harm, does it? Why should it be banned then?

    I also disagree with the "hypocrisy" argument. I used the example of gore earlier, as in people who get turned on by anime characters getting killed. That people aren't called psychopath because of their preferences, that is unless their fetish is extended in real actions or by watching videos featuring real people getting killed.

    I understand your point though. I just don't think it's applicable in all the cases. There are people who are only aroused by cartoons (girls getting fucked by bugs or octopuses are other examples) and that wouldn't react the same way if such fantasies would happen in real life.

    Basically, what I'm trying to say is that lolicon is not responsible for the real cases of pedophilia and kids raping police is dealing with. One can like watching the cartoon but can be completely disgusted and revolted by actual kids getting raped. The authorities should focus more on actual child porn and rapists instead of pointing a finger at drawings.

    I agree with this wholeheartedly. :p But still, people should have the freedom to like it or not.
     

Share This Page